Devenir membre +
Accès membres +
  • La Société
    • Mot du président
    • Mission et vision
    • Organigramme
    • Conseil d’administration
    • Repères de la SQHA
  • Info patients
    • FAQ
    • Documents utiles
    • Dépliants Éducoeur-en-route
    • Mesure de pression à domicile
    • Appareils recommandés
    • Guides alimentaires
    • Recommandations canadiennes
    • Mots usuels
    • Sondage
  • Info professionnels
    • Formation en ligne
    • Journée de formation clinique
    • Recommandations canadiennes
    • Liens utiles
    • Adhésion
    • Prise en charge des personnes atteintes d’hypertension artérielle
  • Info chercheurs
    • Bourses offertes
    • Lauréats
    • Résumés scientifiques
    • Études cliniques majeures
  • Quoi de neuf?
  • Publications
  • Congrès scientifique 2026
Notre FONDATION

Intensive vs Conventional Blood Pressure Lowering After Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke – The OPTIMAL-BP Randomized Clinical Trial

Share

Intensive vs Conventional Blood Pressure Lowering After Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke
The OPTIMAL-BP Randomized Clinical Trial

Hyo Suk Nam, MD, PhD1; Young Dae Kim, MD, PhD1; JoonNyung Heo, MD1; et al

IMPORTANCE

Optimal blood pressure (BP) control after successful reperfusion with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for patients with acute ischemic stroke is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether intensive BP management during the first 24 hours after successful reperfusion leads to better clinical outcomes than conventional BP management in patients who underwent EVT.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Multicenter, randomized, open-label trial with a blinded end-point evaluation, conducted across 19 stroke centers in South Korea from June 2020 to November 2022 (final follow-up, March 8, 2023). It included 306 patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke treated with EVT and with a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b or greater (partial or complete reperfusion).

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly assigned to receive intensive BP management (systolic BP target <140 mm Hg; n = 155) or conventional management (systolic BP target 140-180 mm Hg; n = 150) for 24 hours after enrollment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was functional independence at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2). The primary safety outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 36 hours and death related to the index stroke within 3 months.

RESULTS

The trial was terminated early based on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring board, which noted safety concerns. Among 306 randomized patients, 305 were confirmed eligible and 302 (99.0%) completed the trial (mean age, 73.0 years; 122 women [40.4%]). The intensive management group had a lower proportion achieving functional independence (39.4%) than the conventional management group (54.4%), with a significant risk difference (−15.1% [95% CI, −26.2% to −3.9%]) and adjusted odds ratio (0.56 [95% CI, 0.33-0.96]; P = .03). Rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage were 9.0% in the intensive group and 8.1% in the conventional group (risk difference, 1.0% [95% CI, −5.3% to 7.3%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.48-2.53]; P = .82). Death related to the index stroke within 3 months occurred in 7.7% of the intensive group and 5.4% of the conventional group (risk difference, 2.3% [95% CI, −3.3% to 7.9%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.73 [95% CI, 0.61-4.92]; P = .31).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients who achieved successful reperfusion with EVT for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, intensive BP management for 24 hours led to a lower likelihood of functional independence at 3 months compared with conventional BP management. These results suggest that intensive BP management should be avoided after successful EVT in acute ischemic stroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04205305

LIRE L’ARTICLE

Share

Share

Quoi de Neuf?

  • Vidéos
  • Archives 2024
  • Archives 2023
  • Archives 2022
  • Archives 2021
  • Archives 2020
  • Archives 2010 – 2019
  • Archives 2002 – 2009

La Société

  • Mot du président
  • Mission et vision
  • Organigramme
  • Conseil d’administration
  • Repères de la SQHA
  • Petite histoire de la SQHA
  • Membres fondateurs

Info patients

  • Informations
  • Foire aux questions
  • Documents utiles
  • Appareils recommandés
  • Mesure à domicile
  • Mots usuels
  • Recommandations canadiennes

Info professionnels

  • Prise en charge des personnes atteintes d’hypertension artérielle
  • Journée de formation clinique
  • Adhésion 2025
  • Formation en ligne

Info chercheurs

  • Bourses offertes
  • Bourses – Prix 2025-2026
  • Résumés scientifiques
  • Études cliniques majeures

Congrès scientifique

  • Réunion scientifique annuelle
  • Réunions antérieures

Prise en charge

  • Adultes
  • Femmes enceintes et post-partum
  • Enfants et adolescents
  • Nous joindre
  • Modalités d’utilisation
  • Protection des renseignements personnels
  • Salle de presse
Suivez-nous sur Facebook et LinkedIn !

© 2025 Tous droits réservés | Société québécoise d'hypertension artérielle
Réalisation de MMIC.net

MENU
  • La Société
    • Mot du président
    • Mission et vision
    • Organigramme
    • Conseil d’administration
    • Repères de la SQHA
  • Info patients
    • FAQ
    • Documents utiles
    • Dépliants Éducoeur-en-route
    • Mesure de pression à domicile
    • Appareils recommandés
    • Guides alimentaires
    • Recommandations canadiennes
    • Mots usuels
    • Sondage
  • Info professionnels
    • Formation en ligne
    • Journée de formation clinique
    • Recommandations canadiennes
    • Liens utiles
    • Adhésion
    • Prise en charge des personnes atteintes d’hypertension artérielle
  • Info chercheurs
    • Bourses offertes
    • Lauréats
    • Résumés scientifiques
    • Études cliniques majeures
  • Quoi de neuf?
  • Publications
  • Congrès scientifique 2026